{"id":34279,"date":"2026-03-09T16:15:52","date_gmt":"2026-03-09T09:15:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/times.edu.vn\/?p=34279"},"modified":"2026-05-08T15:49:59","modified_gmt":"2026-05-08T08:49:59","slug":"tok-exhibition-guidance","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/times.edu.vn\/en\/ib\/tok-exhibition-guidance\/","title":{"rendered":"IB TOK Exhibition Guidance: Complete Step-by-Step Guide for 10\/10"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>This <strong>TOK exhibition guidance<\/strong>\u00a0helps <a href=\"https:\/\/times.edu.vn\/en\/ib\/the-ultimate-ib-diploma-program-ibdp-guide\/\"><strong>IB<\/strong><\/a>\u00a0students complete the Theory of Knowledge exhibition confidently by choosing one IA Prompt and using <strong>three specific real-world objects<\/strong>\u00a0to prove it through clear <strong>evidence<\/strong>\u00a0and strong <strong>justification<\/strong>. It explains how to connect each object to focused <strong>Knowledge Questions<\/strong>, apply core <strong>epistemology<\/strong>, and use relevant <strong>Areas of Knowledge<\/strong>\u00a0without forcing them unnaturally. You will also learn a reliable 950-word structure, common misconceptions that lower marks, and what examiners reward in moderation. With the right object\u2013prompt fit and sharper analysis, students can build a high-scoring exhibition that demonstrates TOK thinking in real contexts.<\/p>\n<h2><strong>Essential TOK Exhibition Guidance for IB Students<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-34336\" src=\"https:\/\/times.edu.vn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/7-4.webp\" alt=\"TOK Exhibition Guidance: A Clear Step-by-Step Guide to Scoring Higher\" width=\"1000\" height=\"558\" srcset=\"https:\/\/times.edu.vn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/7-4.webp 1000w, https:\/\/times.edu.vn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/7-4-300x167.webp 300w, https:\/\/times.edu.vn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/7-4-768x429.webp 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1000px) 100vw, 1000px\" \/> The TOK exhibition is an individual internal assessment in <strong>Theory of Knowledge<\/strong>\u00a0that asks you to select <strong>one<\/strong>\u00a0of the IB\u2019s <strong>35 IA Prompt<\/strong>\u00a0questions and build a mini \u201ccase study\u201d around it using <strong>three real-world objects<\/strong>. Your submission is a single file that includes your chosen prompt, images of the objects, and a combined written commentary with a <strong>maximum of 950 words<\/strong>, plus references. Based on our years of practical tutoring at Times Edu, the fastest way to raise marks is to treat the exhibition as an argument about <strong>evidence<\/strong>\u00a0and <strong>justification<\/strong>, not as a scrapbook of interesting items. Each object must earn its place\u00a0by proving a precise claim about knowledge and by addressing a likely objection. A critical detail most students overlook in the 2026 exam cycle is that the exhibition is assessed as applied <strong>epistemology<\/strong>: The examiner rewards clear thinking about how knowledge is produced, used, and challenged in real contexts. The IB frames TOK assessment through an exhibition and a 1,600-word essay, reinforcing that TOK is about how we know what we claim to know, not memorising definitions.<\/p>\n<h3><strong>What \u201cgood\u201d looks like in one sentence<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p>A high-scoring exhibition shows three objects that force\u00a0you to answer a <strong>Knowledge Question<\/strong>\u00a0with nuanced <strong>justification<\/strong>, grounded in a specific context, and connected to TOK concepts and (where relevant) <strong>Areas of Knowledge<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p><strong class=\"read-more-post\">&gt;&gt;&gt; Read more:<\/strong> <a class=\"xem-them-link\" href=\"https:\/\/times.edu.vn\/en\/ib\/ib-tok-exhibition-checklist\/\">IB TOK Exhibition<\/a> 2026 Checklist: What to Prepare Before You Finalize and Submit<\/p>\n<h2><strong>Selecting the Right Objects for Your IA Prompt<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p>Your object choices determine your ceiling score. Weak objects lead to vague commentary, and vague commentary cannot demonstrate strong TOK thinking.<\/p>\n<h3><strong>Non-negotiable object rules (what moderators expect)<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p>The TOK guide\u2019s assessment details specify <strong>three objects (or images of objects)<\/strong>, each tied to the same IA prompt, each identified with its specific real-world context, and each justified in relation to the prompt. Use this checklist before you commit:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Specificity:<\/strong>\u00a0One identifiable\u00a0object, not a category.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Traceable context:<\/strong>\u00a0Where it came from, who used it, when, and why it matters.<\/li>\n<li><strong>TOK leverage:<\/strong>\u00a0The object should create a tension about knowledge (reliability, authority, bias, method, interpretation).<\/li>\n<li><strong>Argument potential:<\/strong>\u00a0The object should support a claim <strong>and<\/strong>\u00a0invite a counterclaim.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Common misconceptions that destroy object quality<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Misconception 1: \u201cAny object works if I explain it well.\u201d <\/strong>If the object does not naturally generate a knowledge dispute, your analysis becomes descriptive.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Misconception 2: \u201cObjects must represent different Areas of Knowledge.\u201d <\/strong>Diversity helps, but forced <strong>Areas of Knowledge<\/strong>\u00a0coverage creates shallow links and unnatural writing.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Misconception 3: \u201cBigger global issues automatically score higher.\u201d <\/strong>A personal, well-contextualised object often enables sharper justification than a generic global symbol.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>High-impact object types (with practical examples)<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p>From our direct experience with international school curricula, these object categories tend to produce stronger analysis because they carry built-in epistemic problems.<\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<th colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><strong>Object type<\/strong><\/th>\n<th colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><strong>Why it works for epistemology<\/strong><\/th>\n<th colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><strong>Example (specific)<\/strong><\/th>\n<th colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><strong>Typical Knowledge Questions it triggers<\/strong><\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">Measurement artifacts<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">Highlights precision, uncertainty, method<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">A lab report with error propagation from your chemistry IA trial<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">What counts as \u201creliable\u201d evidence?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">Institutional documents<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">Exposes authority, standards, bias<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">A school\u2019s academic honesty policy with a plagiarism screenshot<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">Who decides what is acceptable knowledge?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">Cultural products<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">Shows interpretation and perspective<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">A censored edition of a novel used in one country\u2019s curriculum<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">How do values shape knowledge?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">Digital traces<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">Tests credibility and manipulation<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">A metadata view of an edited image used in a news claim<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">When does information become knowledge?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">Personal skill tools<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">Demonstrates tacit knowledge<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">A marked-up sheet music score with your annotations<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">Can knowledge be non-propositional?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>Keep your objects \u201carguable.\u201d If everyone would interpret the object the same way, you have limited TOK depth.<\/p>\n<h3><strong>A practical filter: \u201cObject\u2013Prompt Fit Score\u201d<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p>The pedagogical approach we recommend for high-achievers is to score each candidate object from 1\u20135 on these dimensions:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Context clarity<\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong>Prompt relevance<\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong>Evidence strength<\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong>Counterclaim potential<\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong>Concept density<\/strong>\u00a0(links to epistemology, justification, interpretation, bias, method)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Choose objects that score <strong>20+<\/strong>. This makes your writing phase dramatically more efficient.<\/p>\n<p><strong class=\"read-more-post\">&gt;&gt;&gt; Read more:<\/strong> <a class=\"xem-them-link\" href=\"https:\/\/times.edu.vn\/en\/ib\/ib-tok-exhibition-timeline\/\">IB TOK Exhibition<\/a> 2026 Timeline: A Simple Step-by-Step Plan to Stay on Schedule<\/p>\n<h2><strong>Connecting Objects to the Core TOK Theme<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p>IB guidance strongly recommends rooting the exhibition in a TOK theme (core or optional) because it helps you narrow object choices and focus your reasoning. The core theme asks how knowledge operates in the world around you. This is not an invitation to summarise the theme. It is a demand to show the theme working\u00a0through your objects.<\/p>\n<h3><strong>The \u201clinking chain\u201d that examiners reward<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p>A reliable structure for each object paragraph is a chain of reasoning:<\/p>\n<ol start=\"1\">\n<li><strong>Object and context<\/strong>\u00a0(what it is, where it is situated in the real world).<\/li>\n<li><strong>Knowledge claim<\/strong>\u00a0(a precise answer-attempt to the IA prompt).<\/li>\n<li><strong>Evidence and justification<\/strong>\u00a0(how the object supports the claim).<\/li>\n<li><strong>Knowledge counterclaim<\/strong>\u00a0(a credible challenge).<\/li>\n<li><strong>Evaluation<\/strong>\u00a0(why your justification still holds, or how it must be qualified).<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>This method keeps you in TOK thinking rather than storytelling.<\/p>\n<h3><strong>How to convert an IA Prompt into a usable Knowledge Question<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p>Many students copy the prompt and then drift into generalities. Your job is to operationalise the prompt into a <strong>Knowledge Question<\/strong>\u00a0you can actually argue. Use one of these transformations:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Scope the prompt:<\/strong>\u00a0Add in this context\u00a0and by this method.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Define the knowledge type:<\/strong>\u00a0Propositional vs procedural vs experiential.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Identify the knower:<\/strong>\u00a0Individual vs community, expert vs layperson.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Name the epistemic standard:<\/strong>\u00a0Validity, reliability, coherence, consensus.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Example transformation:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>IA Prompt (illustrative): \u201cWhat counts as knowledge?\u201d<\/li>\n<li>Usable Knowledge Question: \u201cIn clinical decision-making, what standards of evidence justify treating a correlation as knowledge rather than tentative information?\u201d<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Avoid the most common \u201cTOK exhibition\u201d reasoning trap<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p>Students often confuse <strong>topics<\/strong>\u00a0with <strong>knowledge<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Topic: Climate change, AI, propaganda, religion.<\/li>\n<li>TOK focus: How claims are justified, how evidence is evaluated, how authority is granted, how perspectives shape interpretation.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>If your paragraph can be copied into a geography essay, it is not TOK.<\/p>\n<p><strong class=\"read-more-post\">&gt;&gt;&gt; Read more:<\/strong> <a class=\"xem-them-link\" href=\"https:\/\/times.edu.vn\/en\/ib\/ib-tok-essay-past-paper-strategy\/\">IB TOK Essay Past Paper Strategy for<\/a> 2026: How to Use Sample Essays and Feedback Effectively<\/p>\n<h2><strong>Structuring Your 950-Word Commentary<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-34338\" src=\"https:\/\/times.edu.vn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/8-4.webp\" alt=\"TOK Exhibition Guidance: A Clear Step-by-Step Guide to Scoring Higher\" width=\"1000\" height=\"558\" srcset=\"https:\/\/times.edu.vn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/8-4.webp 1000w, https:\/\/times.edu.vn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/8-4-300x167.webp 300w, https:\/\/times.edu.vn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/8-4-768x429.webp 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1000px) 100vw, 1000px\" \/> Your commentary is capped at <strong>950 words<\/strong>, and if you exceed the limit, examiners are instructed to stop reading after the first 950 words and mark only what they have read. That rule changes how you plan. Word economy is a scoring strategy.<\/p>\n<h3><strong>Recommended macro-structure (high reliability)<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p>Use a clean structure that fits moderation expectations:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Introduction (90\u2013130 words)<\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong>Object 1 (240\u2013270 words)<\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong>Object 2 (240\u2013270 words)<\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong>Object 3 (240\u2013270 words)<\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong>Closing synthesis (60\u201390 words)<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>This aligns with the IB requirement to identify context and justify links for each object inside one combined word limit.<\/p>\n<h3><strong>What your introduction must do (and what it must avoid)<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p>Do:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Restate the IA Prompt exactly and state your interpretation boundary.<\/li>\n<li>Define one key term only if it is contested in your argument.<\/li>\n<li>Preview the logic that connects the three objects as a set.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Avoid:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>History of TOK.<\/li>\n<li>Over-defining <strong>epistemology<\/strong>\u00a0with textbook summaries.<\/li>\n<li>Listing <strong>Areas of Knowledge<\/strong>\u00a0without using them analytically.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>The \u201cObject Paragraph Template\u201d (copy-ready structure)<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p>Based on our years of practical tutoring at Times Edu, this template produces the strongest examiner experience. <strong>Sentence set A: <\/strong><strong>C<\/strong><strong>ontext<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Identify the object precisely.<\/li>\n<li>State where it appears in the real world and why that context matters.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Sentence set B: <\/strong><strong>K<\/strong><strong>nowledge claim<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Make a claim that answers the IA prompt in this context.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Sentence set C: <\/strong><strong>E<\/strong><strong>vidence and justification<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Explain how the object functions as evidence.<\/li>\n<li>Name the standard of justification (method, authority, coherence, replication, expertise).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Sentence set D: <\/strong><strong>C<\/strong><strong>ounterclaim and evaluation<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Offer a realistic challenge.<\/li>\n<li>Refine your claim to show intellectual honesty.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>A table to control word count (recommended planning tool)<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p>Use a planning table before you draft.<\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<th colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><strong>Section<\/strong><\/th>\n<th colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><strong>Target words<\/strong><\/th>\n<th colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><strong>Must include<\/strong><\/th>\n<th colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><strong>Must not include<\/strong><\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">Introduction<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">90\u2013130<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">prompt interpretation + linking logic<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">broad TOK history<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">Each object<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">240\u2013270<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">context + claim + justification + evaluation<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">long narration<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">Closing synthesis<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">60\u201390<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">insight across objects<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">new evidence<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>If you plan at this level, you rarely break the 950-word cap.<\/p>\n<h3><strong>Referencing: <\/strong><strong>D<\/strong><strong>o it like an academic, not like a blogger<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p>The TOK assessment details call for \u201cappropriate citations and references.\u201d If your object involves published claims (statistics, historical assertions, scientific results), cite them. If your object is personal (a certificate, a photograph you took), cite the origin as \u201cpersonal artifact\u201d with context.<\/p>\n<p><strong class=\"read-more-post\">&gt;&gt;&gt; Read more:<\/strong> <a class=\"xem-them-link\" href=\"https:\/\/times.edu.vn\/en\/ib\/ib-extended-essay-timeline\/\">IB Extended Essay Timeline<\/a> 2026: A Simple Plan to Finish on Time Without Stress<\/p>\n<h2><strong>Scoring High with the TOK Exhibition Rubric<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p>The exhibition is internally assessed by your teacher and externally moderated by the IB. This means your work must be clear enough to survive moderation beyond your classroom context.<\/p>\n<h3><strong>What the top band actually rewards<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p>High marks come from a single integrated performance:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Strong, explicit <strong>justification<\/strong>\u00a0for why each object fits the IA prompt.<\/li>\n<li>Clear, non-obvious TOK analysis showing <strong>epistemology<\/strong>\u00a0in action.<\/li>\n<li>A credible sense of limitation, perspective, or counterclaim.<\/li>\n<li>Precision: You control the scope instead of chasing every angle.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Grade-boundary thinking (what to optimise)<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p>You do not need more objects, more definitions, or more rhetorical flourish. You need better epistemic control. Optimise these levers:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Claim sharpness:<\/strong>\u00a0One claim per object, not three.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Justification density:<\/strong>\u00a0Every 2\u20133 sentences should do reasoning work.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Context specificity:<\/strong>\u00a0Moderation rewards real-world anchoring.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Evaluation maturity:<\/strong>\u00a0Concede something meaningful, then refine.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Red flags that typically cap performance<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p>A critical detail most students overlook in the 2026 exam cycle is that moderation punishes \u201cperformative TOK language\u201d when it is not tied to evidence. Avoid:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Name-dropping <strong>Areas of Knowledge<\/strong>\u00a0without applying their methods.<\/li>\n<li>Treating \u201cperspectives\u201d as a slogan rather than an analytic tool.<\/li>\n<li>Replacing justification with moral opinions.<\/li>\n<li>Writing three mini-essays that do not speak to each other.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>How to create the \u201cthree-object synergy\u201d examiners remember<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p>Your closing synthesis should not repeat your object paragraphs. It should extract an insight about knowledge that only becomes visible when the three objects are viewed together. Use one of these synthesis patterns:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Method contrast:<\/strong>\u00a0Different standards of evidence reach different levels of certainty.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Authority contrast:<\/strong>\u00a0Expertise strengthens knowledge claims but introduces dependence.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Context shift:<\/strong>\u00a0The same information becomes knowledge or misinformation depending on how it is used.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong class=\"read-more-post\">&gt;&gt;&gt; Read more:<\/strong> <a class=\"xem-them-link\" href=\"https:\/\/times.edu.vn\/en\/ib\/ib-ia-workload-management\/\">IB IA Workload Management for<\/a> 2026: Smart Ways to Balance Research, Writing, and Deadlines<\/p>\n<h2><strong>Frequently Asked Questions<\/strong><\/h2>\n<div class=\"hoi-dap-thok-new low-faq\">\n<div class=\"thong-tin-dai\">\n<p class=\"tit-dai\"><strong>How many objects are needed for the TOK exhibition?<\/strong><\/p>\n<div class=\"chi-tiet-thong-tin\">You must use <strong>three objects<\/strong>, or <strong>images of objects<\/strong>, all linked to the same IA Prompt. Group work is not allowed, and students in the same class should not use the same objects.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"thong-tin-dai\">\n<p class=\"tit-dai\"><strong>What are the TOK exhibition prompts for 2026?<\/strong><\/p>\n<div class=\"chi-tiet-thong-tin\">The IB provides a set of <strong>35 IA prompts<\/strong>\u00a0in the TOK guide for the exhibition. Unlike the TOK essay titles, which are released per examination session, the exhibition uses the guide\u2019s prompt set; your school will direct you to the official list used for your cohort.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"thong-tin-dai\">\n<p class=\"tit-dai\"><strong>How do I choose objects for TOK?<\/strong><\/p>\n<div class=\"chi-tiet-thong-tin\">Choose objects that create an arguable knowledge tension and allow strong <strong>evidence<\/strong>\u00a0and <strong>justification<\/strong>. A practical method is to prioritise specificity, context traceability, and counterclaim potential.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"thong-tin-dai\">\n<p class=\"tit-dai\"><strong>How is the TOK exhibition moderated?<\/strong><\/p>\n<div class=\"chi-tiet-thong-tin\">Your TOK teacher marks the exhibition internally, and samples are submitted to the IB for external moderation. This is why your context explanations must be explicit and not dependent on classroom-only knowledge.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"thong-tin-dai\">\n<p class=\"tit-dai\"><strong>What is the word count for the TOK exhibition commentary?<\/strong><\/p>\n<div class=\"chi-tiet-thong-tin\">The written commentary has a <strong>maximum of 950 words<\/strong>. If you exceed it, examiners are instructed to stop reading after 950 words.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"thong-tin-dai\">\n<p class=\"tit-dai\"><strong>Can I use a digital object for my TOK exhibition?<\/strong><\/p>\n<div class=\"chi-tiet-thong-tin\">Yes, as long as it is treated as an object with a specific real-world context and you include an image of it in your single submission file. Screenshots, metadata views, or archived versions can strengthen your justification if credibility is part of your Knowledge Question.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"thong-tin-dai\">\n<p class=\"tit-dai\"><strong>How do I link an object to a knowledge question?<\/strong><\/p>\n<div class=\"chi-tiet-thong-tin\">State the <strong>Knowledge Question<\/strong>\u00a0you are answering in that paragraph, then show how the object functions as <strong>evidence<\/strong>\u00a0under a named standard of <strong>justification<\/strong>. Add a counterclaim that challenges the link, then qualify your claim to show epistemic discipline.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<h4>Conclusion<\/h4>\n<p>Based on our years of practical tutoring at <a href=\"https:\/\/times.edu.vn\/en\/\">Times Edu<\/a>, students improve fastest when they receive prompt\u2013object matching feedback before drafting and a rubric-aligned edit pass after drafting. If you want a personalised plan, share:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Your chosen IA Prompt (or your top 3),<\/li>\n<li>5\u20137 Candidate objects with one-line context each,<\/li>\n<li>Your intended theme and any relevant Areas of Knowledge.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>We will return a targeted <strong>TOK exhibition guidance<\/strong>\u00a0roadmap: Object selection, Knowledge Questions, justification strategy, and a 950-word structure that is built for moderation.<\/p>\n\n\n<div class=\"kk-star-ratings kksr-auto kksr-align-right kksr-valign-bottom\"\n    data-payload='{&quot;align&quot;:&quot;right&quot;,&quot;id&quot;:&quot;34279&quot;,&quot;slug&quot;:&quot;default&quot;,&quot;valign&quot;:&quot;bottom&quot;,&quot;ignore&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;reference&quot;:&quot;auto&quot;,&quot;class&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;count&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;legendonly&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;readonly&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;score&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;starsonly&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;best&quot;:&quot;5&quot;,&quot;gap&quot;:&quot;5&quot;,&quot;greet&quot;:&quot;\u0110\u00e1nh gi\u00e1 b\u00e0i vi\u1ebft&quot;,&quot;legend&quot;:&quot;0\\\/5 - (0 votes)&quot;,&quot;size&quot;:&quot;24&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;IB TOK Exhibition Guidance: Complete Step-by-Step Guide for 10\\\/10&quot;,&quot;width&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;_legend&quot;:&quot;{score}\\\/{best} - ({count} {votes})&quot;,&quot;font_factor&quot;:&quot;1.25&quot;}'>\n            \n<div class=\"kksr-stars\">\n    \n<div class=\"kksr-stars-inactive\">\n            <div class=\"kksr-star\" data-star=\"1\" style=\"padding-right: 5px\">\n            \n\n<div class=\"kksr-icon\" style=\"width: 24px; height: 24px;\"><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n            <div class=\"kksr-star\" data-star=\"2\" style=\"padding-right: 5px\">\n            \n\n<div class=\"kksr-icon\" style=\"width: 24px; height: 24px;\"><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n            <div class=\"kksr-star\" data-star=\"3\" style=\"padding-right: 5px\">\n            \n\n<div class=\"kksr-icon\" style=\"width: 24px; height: 24px;\"><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n            <div class=\"kksr-star\" data-star=\"4\" style=\"padding-right: 5px\">\n            \n\n<div class=\"kksr-icon\" style=\"width: 24px; height: 24px;\"><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n            <div class=\"kksr-star\" data-star=\"5\" style=\"padding-right: 5px\">\n            \n\n<div class=\"kksr-icon\" style=\"width: 24px; height: 24px;\"><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/div>\n    \n<div class=\"kksr-stars-active\" style=\"width: 0px;\">\n            <div class=\"kksr-star\" style=\"padding-right: 5px\">\n            \n\n<div class=\"kksr-icon\" style=\"width: 24px; height: 24px;\"><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n            <div class=\"kksr-star\" style=\"padding-right: 5px\">\n            \n\n<div class=\"kksr-icon\" style=\"width: 24px; height: 24px;\"><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n            <div class=\"kksr-star\" style=\"padding-right: 5px\">\n            \n\n<div class=\"kksr-icon\" style=\"width: 24px; height: 24px;\"><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n            <div class=\"kksr-star\" style=\"padding-right: 5px\">\n            \n\n<div class=\"kksr-icon\" style=\"width: 24px; height: 24px;\"><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n            <div class=\"kksr-star\" style=\"padding-right: 5px\">\n            \n\n<div class=\"kksr-icon\" style=\"width: 24px; height: 24px;\"><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/div>\n<\/div>\n                \n\n<div class=\"kksr-legend\" style=\"font-size: 19.2px;\">\n            <span class=\"kksr-muted\">\u0110\u00e1nh gi\u00e1 b\u00e0i vi\u1ebft<\/span>\n    <\/div>\n    <\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This TOK exhibition guidance\u00a0helps IB\u00a0students complete the Theory of Knowledge exhibition confidently by choosing one IA Prompt and using three specific real-world objects\u00a0to prove it through clear evidence\u00a0and strong justification. It explains how to connect each object to focused Knowledge Questions, apply core epistemology, and use relevant Areas of Knowledge\u00a0without forcing them unnaturally. You will &#8230; <a title=\"IB TOK Exhibition Guidance: Complete Step-by-Step Guide for 10\/10\" class=\"read-more\" href=\"https:\/\/times.edu.vn\/en\/ib\/tok-exhibition-guidance\/\" aria-label=\"Read more about IB TOK Exhibition Guidance: Complete Step-by-Step Guide for 10\/10\">Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":34280,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"content-type":"","rank_math_title":"IB TOK Exhibition Guidance: Complete Step-by-Step Guide for 10\/10","rank_math_description":"Complete IB Theory of Knowledge Exhibition guide: 3 objects selection, IA prompt linking, 950-word commentary structure, mark scheme criteria. Step-by-step for 10\/10.","footnotes":""},"categories":[170],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-34279","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-ib"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/times.edu.vn\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34279","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/times.edu.vn\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/times.edu.vn\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/times.edu.vn\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/times.edu.vn\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=34279"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/times.edu.vn\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34279\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":39551,"href":"https:\/\/times.edu.vn\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34279\/revisions\/39551"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/times.edu.vn\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/34280"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/times.edu.vn\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=34279"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/times.edu.vn\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=34279"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/times.edu.vn\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=34279"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}