{"id":35852,"date":"2026-03-23T11:47:19","date_gmt":"2026-03-23T04:47:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/times.edu.vn\/?p=35852"},"modified":"2026-05-08T16:44:22","modified_gmt":"2026-05-08T09:44:22","slug":"ib-tok-exhibition-timeline","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/times.edu.vn\/en\/ib\/ib-tok-exhibition-timeline\/","title":{"rendered":"IB TOK Exhibition Timeline 2026: 6-Month Plan from Topic to Submission"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>An effective <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/times.edu.vn\/en\/ib\/the-ultimate-ib-diploma-program-ibdp-guide\/\">IB<\/a><\/strong><strong>\u00a0TOK-exhibition timeline<\/strong>\u00a0usually runs <strong>6\u20138 weeks<\/strong>\u00a0from prompt selection to final submission, with most schools delivering the task across <strong>8\u201310 hours of class time<\/strong>\u00a0plus independent drafting.<\/p>\n<p>Start by mastering the <strong>35 TOK IA prompts<\/strong>\u00a0and shaping focused <strong>Knowledge Questions<\/strong>, then lock <strong>one prompt + three specific TOK Objects<\/strong>\u00a0early to avoid forced links.<\/p>\n<p>Use two drafting cycles to refine your <strong>950-word commentary<\/strong>\u00a0against TOK <strong>Assessment Criteria<\/strong>, keeping each object analytically distinct. Most schools set internal deadlines around <strong>Feb\u2013Mar of DP2 (May session)<\/strong>\u00a0or <strong>Aug\u2013Sep of DP2 (November session)<\/strong>, with extra buffer time for teacher checks and upload.<\/p>\n<h2><strong>A Complete IB TOK-Exhibition Timeline For Students<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-35880\" src=\"https:\/\/times.edu.vn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/9-14.webp\" alt=\"IB TOK Exhibition 2026 Timeline: A Simple Step-by-Step Plan to Stay on Schedule\" width=\"1000\" height=\"558\" srcset=\"https:\/\/times.edu.vn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/9-14.webp 1000w, https:\/\/times.edu.vn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/9-14-300x167.webp 300w, https:\/\/times.edu.vn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/9-14-768x429.webp 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1000px) 100vw, 1000px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>The TOK Exhibition is the International Baccalaureate\u00a0Theory of Knowledge\u00a0Internal Assessment\u00a0that many students underestimate until the last eight weeks. It is an individual task worth <strong>33%<\/strong>\u00a0of the final TOK grade and requires <strong>three TOK Objects<\/strong>\u00a0linked to <strong>one of the 35 Prompts<\/strong>, explained through a single <strong>950-word<\/strong>\u00a0commentary. Based on our years of practical tutoring at Times Edu, the students who score in the top band do not \u201cstart early\u201d in a vague way. They lock a realistic <strong>IB TOK-exhibition timeline<\/strong>, build drafting cycles around teacher feedback, and treat object selection like evidence selection in a legal case.<\/p>\n<h3><strong>What the IB requires (and what your school controls)<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p>The IB sets submission requirements and expects schools to manage internal staging and deadlines so everything is ready by the upload date. Schools are explicitly advised to set internal deadlines for different stages of TOK components, aligned with IB submission timelines. That is why two students in the same exam session can have very different day-to-day schedules. Your IB Diploma Programme\u00a0coordinator controls the operational deadline that actually affects you.<\/p>\n<h3><strong>Typical internal windows (May vs November sessions)<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p>Many schools structure the exhibition across roughly <strong>8\u201310 hours of class time<\/strong>, then push drafting and polishing into homework blocks. A common pattern is that May-session schools push final internal submission around <strong>February\u2013March of DP2<\/strong>, and November-session schools push around <strong>August\u2013September of DP2<\/strong>, then buffer for admin and upload.<\/p>\n<h3><strong>Timeline table you can adapt immediately<\/strong><\/h3>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<th colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><strong>Phase (what you must produce)<\/strong><\/th>\n<th colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><strong>May Session target (DP1\u2013DP2)<\/strong><\/th>\n<th colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><strong>November Session target (DP1\u2013DP2)<\/strong><\/th>\n<th colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><strong>Output you should have \u201cin hand\u201d<\/strong><\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">Foundation + prompt literacy<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">DP1 Term 1\u20132<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">DP1 Term 1\u20132<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">Shortlist of 6\u20138 of the 35 Prompts, and 2\u20133 knowledge angles per prompt<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">Object scouting + feasibility checks<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">DP1 Term 2\u20133<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">DP1 Term 2\u20133<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">8\u201312 candidate TOK Objects with context notes and photo plan<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">Prompt lock + object lock<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">Early DP2<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">Early DP2<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">Final prompt + 3 objects + a one-page rationale map<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">Draft 1 (structure-first)<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">Dec\u2013Jan<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">May\u2013Jun<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">950-word draft with clean object\u2013prompt links<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">Draft 2 (analysis-first)<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">Jan\u2013Feb<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">Jun\u2013Jul<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">Improved justification, sharper Knowledge Questions, reduced \u201cdescription\u201d<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">Final pack + compliance<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">Feb\u2013Mar<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">Aug\u2013Sep<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">Final file with images and final commentary ready for school upload<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>This table is not an \u201cideal schedule.\u201d It is the minimum viable schedule for students targeting top results while juggling HL workloads and university applications.<\/p>\n<p><strong class=\"read-more-post\">&gt;&gt;&gt; Read more:<\/strong> <a class=\"xem-them-link\" href=\"https:\/\/times.edu.vn\/en\/ib\/ib-tok-essay-timeline\/\">IB TOK Essay 2026 Timeline: A Step-by-Step Schedule to Finish on Time<\/a><\/p>\n<h2><strong>Key Milestones For Theory Of Knowledge Exhibition Planning<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p>A high-scoring TOK Exhibition is built on decisive milestones, not endless brainstorming. Each milestone should end with a tangible artifact you can show a teacher in under two minutes.<\/p>\n<h3><strong>Milestone 1: Build prompt fluency (Week 1\u20132 of your exhibition block)<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p>Do not read the <strong>35 Prompts<\/strong>\u00a0like philosophy questions. Read them like assessment tasks that demand specific objects, specific claims, and specific limitations. From our direct experience with international school curricula, students lose marks when they treat the prompt as a theme (\u201ctechnology,\u201d \u201cculture,\u201d \u201cbias\u201d) instead of a precise knowledge problem. Create a shortlist of 6\u20138 prompts that you can actually evidence\u00a0through objects in your real life. <strong>Prompt fluency drill (fast and effective):<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>For each shortlisted prompt, write <strong>two Knowledge Questions<\/strong>\u00a0that are narrower than the prompt.<\/li>\n<li>For each Knowledge Question, write one claim and one counterclaim in plain language.<\/li>\n<li>For each claim, write what kind of object could act as evidence (document, artifact, tool, image, product, interface, etc.).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Milestone 2: Object scouting that avoids the \u201cgeneric object\u201d trap (Week 2\u20134)<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p>A critical detail most students overlook in the 2026 exam cycle is that examiners reward <strong>justified object choice<\/strong>, not \u201cinteresting-looking items.\u201d The object must be real, specific, and embedded in context, because the commentary is assessed holistically against how well the objects illuminate the prompt. <strong>A strong TOK Objects shortlist has:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>One object that anchors a clear real-world knowledge practice\u00a0(science, media, law, art, history, tech, community knowledge).<\/li>\n<li>One object that introduces a sharp limitation, bias, or ethical constraint.<\/li>\n<li>One object that forces a comparison across perspectives or methods of knowing.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Milestone 3: Prompt lock (decision point, not a suggestion)<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p>You should lock the prompt once you can answer three questions with evidence:<\/p>\n<ol start=\"1\">\n<li>What is the knowledge issue?<\/li>\n<li>Why do these\u00a0three objects reveal it better than alternatives?<\/li>\n<li>Where could your argument be wrong, and how will you show that?<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>If you cannot answer (2), you are not ready to lock objects. If you cannot answer (3), you are not ready to draft.<\/p>\n<h3><strong>Milestone 4: Drafting the 950-word commentary (4\u20138 weeks before the internal deadline)<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p>The commentary is <strong>up to 950 words<\/strong>\u00a0and must cover all three objects, so \u201cperfect writing\u201d is not the main bottleneck. Precision is. The pedagogical approach we recommend for high-achievers is a two-pass method:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Pass 1 builds logic: Object \u2192 claim \u2192 knowledge move \u2192 link to prompt.<\/li>\n<li>Pass 2 builds assessment value: Justification, limitations, and implications.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h4><strong>Draft structure that matches assessment logic (not \u201cthree mini essays\u201d)<\/strong><\/h4>\n<p>Use a consistent micro-structure for each object:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Identify the object and its context in one sentence.<\/li>\n<li>Make the knowledge claim it supports in one sentence.<\/li>\n<li>Explain how\u00a0the object shows the knowledge issue (methods, reliability, perspective, power, ethics).<\/li>\n<li>Add one limitation or counterpoint that prevents overclaiming.<\/li>\n<li>Tie back to the prompt with a line that advances the argument.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>This keeps you from wasting words on narrative description that earns no marks.<\/p>\n<p><strong class=\"read-more-post\">&gt;&gt;&gt; Read more:<\/strong> <a class=\"xem-them-link\" href=\"https:\/\/times.edu.vn\/en\/ib\/ib-extended-essay-timeline\/\">IB Extended Essay Timeline 2026: A Simple Plan to Finish on Time Without Stress<\/a><\/p>\n<h2><strong>How To Stay On Track With Your TOK Drafts And Final Submission<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p>Students fall behind for predictable reasons: Uncertain objects, vague Knowledge Questions, and feedback cycles that start too late. Your IB TOK-exhibition timeline should include deliberate \u201crisk checks,\u201d not just writing time.<\/p>\n<h3><strong>A practical week-by-week micro-plan (8-week model)<\/strong><\/h3>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<th colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><strong>Week<\/strong><\/th>\n<th colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><strong>Focus<\/strong><\/th>\n<th colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><strong>What \u201cdone\u201d looks like<\/strong><\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">1<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">Prompt shortlist + KQ drill<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">6\u20138 prompts, 12\u201316 Knowledge Questions, 3 best prompts flagged<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">2<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">Object scouting<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">8\u201312 candidate objects with context notes and evidence value<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">3<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">Lock prompt + 3 objects<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">One-page rationale map + photo plan<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">4<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">Outline<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">Bullet logic for each object (claim, method, limitation, link)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">5<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">Draft 1<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">Full 950-word draft, even if rough<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">6<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">Feedback + Draft 2<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">Teacher notes integrated, justification strengthened<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">7<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">Language tightening<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">Remove description, sharpen links to prompt, verify balance across objects<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">8<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">Compliance + final pack<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">Final file with images and clean referencing as your school requires<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>If your school runs a shorter window, compress Weeks 1\u20133, but do not skip the rationale map. Skipping it is how students end up rewriting from scratch in the final two weeks.<\/p>\n<h3><strong>Common misconceptions that break timelines (and grades)<\/strong><\/h3>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<th colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><strong>Misconception<\/strong><\/th>\n<th colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><strong>Why it fails under Assessment Criteria<\/strong><\/th>\n<th colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><strong>What to do instead<\/strong><\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u201cAny object works if I explain it well.\u201d<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">Weak justification reads like forced linking, which drags the holistic score.<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">Choose objects where the TOK move is visible (method, reliability, bias, authority, ethics).<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u201cTOK is an opinion, so I can be personal and reflective.\u201d<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">Unstructured reflection becomes a description without a clear knowledge claim.<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">Use personal context only to ground the object, then shift to knowledge analysis.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u201cI\u2019ll pick the prompt last.\u201d<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">Prompt-last causes generic objects and shallow Knowledge Questions.<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">Prompt-first, then objects, then commentary.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u201cThree objects = three separate paragraphs.\u201d<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">Examiners reward coherence across objects, not isolated mini-essays.<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">Build a unifying line that accumulates insight across objects.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h3><strong>The feedback loop rule that protects your schedule<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p>Plan for <strong>two feedback cycles<\/strong>, not one. Most schools provide limited teacher guidance, and late feedback is usually about compliance rather than analytical depth. Submit Draft 1 early enough that feedback can change your thinking, not just your wording. If feedback arrives when you have no time to change objects, you have already lost your biggest lever.<\/p>\n<p><strong class=\"read-more-post\">&gt;&gt;&gt; Read more:<\/strong> <a class=\"xem-them-link\" href=\"https:\/\/times.edu.vn\/en\/ib\/tok-exhibition-guidance\/\">TOK Exhibition Guidance for 2026: A Clear Step-by-Step Guide to Scoring Higher<\/a><\/p>\n<h2><strong>Internal Assessment Deadlines And Management Tips<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-35882\" src=\"https:\/\/times.edu.vn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/10-14.webp\" alt=\"IB TOK Exhibition 2026 Timeline: A Simple Step-by-Step Plan to Stay on Schedule\" width=\"1000\" height=\"558\" srcset=\"https:\/\/times.edu.vn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/10-14.webp 1000w, https:\/\/times.edu.vn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/10-14-300x167.webp 300w, https:\/\/times.edu.vn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/10-14-768x429.webp 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1000px) 100vw, 1000px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>The IB is clear that schools must ensure work is received by the submission date and that internal deadlines should support that process. That means missing an internal deadline is not a small inconvenience. It can trigger \u201crush submissions,\u201d reduced feedback, and, in the worst cases, administrative risk.<\/p>\n<h3><strong>The deadline stack you should assume<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p>Most international schools run a layered system:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Student internal deadline (your submission to your teacher).<\/li>\n<li>Department deadline (teacher checks formatting, authentication steps, and file readiness).<\/li>\n<li>Coordinator deadline (upload readiness buffer).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Clastify also notes that schools set exhibition deadlines and that students should confirm the specific date with their IB coordinator.<\/p>\n<h3><strong>Management tips used by top-performing IB students<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p>Based on our years of practical tutoring at Times Edu, these tactics separate strong scorers from last-minute writers. <strong>Build an \u201cobject risk register.\u201d<\/strong> List each object with two risks: \u201cgeneric\/replaceable\u201d risk and \u201cforced link\u201d risk. If either risk is high, replace the object by Week 3. <strong>Track word budget per object, not total words.<\/strong> A 950-word cap means you are effectively working with about <strong>300 words per object<\/strong>\u00a0once transitions are included. <strong>Write to Assessment Criteria, then polish.<\/strong> The TOK Exhibition is marked with a holistic rubric (0\u201310) focused on how convincingly the objects illuminate the prompt through TOK thinking. <strong>Use \u201cgrade boundary thinking\u201d without obsessing over numbers.<\/strong> Grade boundaries shift by session and cohort, so chasing a magic mark is the wrong approach. Use boundaries only to calibrate effort: If you want top outcomes, aim to produce work that reads like top-band rubric descriptors, then let the marks follow.<\/p>\n<h3><strong>How TOK planning connects to subject choices for university profiles<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p>Parents often ask why Times Edu cares so much about a TOK timeline when university offers depend on HL grades. The reason is that strong TOK habits transfer directly into high-impact assessment skills: Argument structure, evidence selection, and critical evaluation. From our direct experience with international school curricula, students building competitive applications should treat subject selection as a coherence problem:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>HL choices should align with intended major pathways and demonstrate appropriate academic rigor.<\/li>\n<li>IA-heavy subjects require schedule realism; stacking multiple time-intensive IAs in one term forces trade-offs that reduce quality.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The IB also has overlap rules and diploma passing criteria that coordinators manage, which is one reason strategic planning should happen early with informed guidance. If you want a personalized roadmap, Times Edu can map your IB Diploma Programme subject choices, IA windows, TOK milestones, and university application deadlines into a single plan that your family can actually execute.<\/p>\n<p><strong class=\"read-more-post\">&gt;&gt;&gt; Read more:<\/strong> <a class=\"xem-them-link\" href=\"https:\/\/times.edu.vn\/en\/ib\/ib-tutor\/\">IB Tutor 2026: How to Choose the Right Tutor for Better Grades and Less Stress<\/a><\/p>\n<h2><strong>Frequently Asked Questions<\/strong><\/h2>\n<div class=\"hoi-dap-thok-new low-faq\">\n<div class=\"thong-tin-dai\">\n<p class=\"tit-dai\"><strong>How long does it take to complete the IB TOK exhibition?<\/strong><\/p>\n<div class=\"chi-tiet-thong-tin\">Most schools spread the work across several weeks, often using around <strong>8\u201310 hours<\/strong>\u00a0of teaching time plus homework drafting. A realistic student timeline is <strong>6\u20138 weeks<\/strong>\u00a0from prompt fluency to a polished final file, especially if you want two feedback cycles.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"thong-tin-dai\">\n<p class=\"tit-dai\"><strong>When is the final deadline for the TOK exhibition?<\/strong><\/p>\n<div class=\"chi-tiet-thong-tin\">There is no single universal student-facing date, because <strong>your school sets the internal deadline<\/strong>\u00a0and must align it with the IB upload schedule.In many schools, May-session students submit internally around <strong>February\u2013March of DP2<\/strong>, while November-session students submit around <strong>August\u2013September of DP2<\/strong>, but you should confirm the exact date with your IB coordinator.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"thong-tin-dai\">\n<p class=\"tit-dai\"><strong>What is the best way to plan a TOK exhibition timeline?<\/strong><\/p>\n<div class=\"chi-tiet-thong-tin\">Start with the prompt shortlist and Knowledge Questions, then lock objects by a fixed decision date. Your plan should include two drafting cycles and a final compliance week for images, formatting, and school submission steps.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"thong-tin-dai\">\n<p class=\"tit-dai\"><strong>How many objects do I need for the TOK exhibition?<\/strong><\/p>\n<div class=\"chi-tiet-thong-tin\">You need <strong>three real-world objects<\/strong>\u00a0linked to <strong>one of the 35 IA prompts<\/strong>, discussed in a single commentary of up to <strong>950 words<\/strong>. Each object should contribute a distinct knowledge angle rather than repeating the same point.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"thong-tin-dai\">\n<p class=\"tit-dai\"><strong>Can I change my objects late in the timeline?<\/strong><\/p>\n<div class=\"chi-tiet-thong-tin\">You can, but it usually damages quality because the best marks come from justified object choice and coherent development across objects. If you must change an object late, replace it with one that preserves your existing Knowledge Questions and argument spine.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"thong-tin-dai\">\n<p class=\"tit-dai\"><strong>What happens if I miss the internal TOK deadline?<\/strong><\/p>\n<div class=\"chi-tiet-thong-tin\">Practically, you lose feedback time and may trigger administrative constraints because schools need buffers to authenticate and upload work. If you are at risk, submit a complete Draft 1 on time, then improve later only if your school allows post-deadline revisions.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"thong-tin-dai\">\n<p class=\"tit-dai\"><strong>How do the 35 prompts fit into the timeline?<\/strong><\/p>\n<div class=\"chi-tiet-thong-tin\">They are the starting point, not an afterthought, because your object selection is only \u201cgood\u201d if it makes one prompt answerable through real evidence. In strong timelines, prompt fluency happens first, prompt lock happens early, and drafting happens only after objects are defensible.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<h4>Conclusion<\/h4>\n<p>If you want, I can turn your current progress (session, DP year, your draft objects, and your shortlisted prompts) into a personalized <strong>IB TOK-exhibition timeline<\/strong>\u00a0with weekly deliverables and teacher-feedback checkpoints. <a href=\"https:\/\/times.edu.vn\/en\/\">Times Edu<\/a>\u00a0uses the same planning framework to help students protect HL grades, avoid IA pile-ups, and present a stronger overall university profile while meeting every Internal Assessment deadline.<\/p>\n\n\n<div class=\"kk-star-ratings kksr-auto kksr-align-right kksr-valign-bottom\"\n    data-payload='{&quot;align&quot;:&quot;right&quot;,&quot;id&quot;:&quot;35852&quot;,&quot;slug&quot;:&quot;default&quot;,&quot;valign&quot;:&quot;bottom&quot;,&quot;ignore&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;reference&quot;:&quot;auto&quot;,&quot;class&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;count&quot;:&quot;1&quot;,&quot;legendonly&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;readonly&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;score&quot;:&quot;5&quot;,&quot;starsonly&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;best&quot;:&quot;5&quot;,&quot;gap&quot;:&quot;5&quot;,&quot;greet&quot;:&quot;\u0110\u00e1nh gi\u00e1 b\u00e0i vi\u1ebft&quot;,&quot;legend&quot;:&quot;5\\\/5 - (1 vote)&quot;,&quot;size&quot;:&quot;24&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;IB TOK Exhibition Timeline 2026: 6-Month Plan from Topic to Submission&quot;,&quot;width&quot;:&quot;142.5&quot;,&quot;_legend&quot;:&quot;{score}\\\/{best} - ({count} {votes})&quot;,&quot;font_factor&quot;:&quot;1.25&quot;}'>\n            \n<div class=\"kksr-stars\">\n    \n<div class=\"kksr-stars-inactive\">\n            <div class=\"kksr-star\" data-star=\"1\" style=\"padding-right: 5px\">\n            \n\n<div class=\"kksr-icon\" style=\"width: 24px; height: 24px;\"><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n            <div class=\"kksr-star\" data-star=\"2\" style=\"padding-right: 5px\">\n            \n\n<div class=\"kksr-icon\" style=\"width: 24px; height: 24px;\"><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n            <div class=\"kksr-star\" data-star=\"3\" style=\"padding-right: 5px\">\n            \n\n<div class=\"kksr-icon\" style=\"width: 24px; height: 24px;\"><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n            <div class=\"kksr-star\" data-star=\"4\" style=\"padding-right: 5px\">\n            \n\n<div class=\"kksr-icon\" style=\"width: 24px; height: 24px;\"><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n            <div class=\"kksr-star\" data-star=\"5\" style=\"padding-right: 5px\">\n            \n\n<div class=\"kksr-icon\" style=\"width: 24px; height: 24px;\"><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/div>\n    \n<div class=\"kksr-stars-active\" style=\"width: 142.5px;\">\n            <div class=\"kksr-star\" style=\"padding-right: 5px\">\n            \n\n<div class=\"kksr-icon\" style=\"width: 24px; height: 24px;\"><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n            <div class=\"kksr-star\" style=\"padding-right: 5px\">\n            \n\n<div class=\"kksr-icon\" style=\"width: 24px; height: 24px;\"><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n            <div class=\"kksr-star\" style=\"padding-right: 5px\">\n            \n\n<div class=\"kksr-icon\" style=\"width: 24px; height: 24px;\"><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n            <div class=\"kksr-star\" style=\"padding-right: 5px\">\n            \n\n<div class=\"kksr-icon\" style=\"width: 24px; height: 24px;\"><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n            <div class=\"kksr-star\" style=\"padding-right: 5px\">\n            \n\n<div class=\"kksr-icon\" style=\"width: 24px; height: 24px;\"><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/div>\n<\/div>\n                \n\n<div class=\"kksr-legend\" style=\"font-size: 19.2px;\">\n            5\/5 - (1 vote)    <\/div>\n    <\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>An effective IB\u00a0TOK-exhibition timeline\u00a0usually runs 6\u20138 weeks\u00a0from prompt selection to final submission, with most schools delivering the task across 8\u201310 hours of class time\u00a0plus independent drafting. Start by mastering the 35 TOK IA prompts\u00a0and shaping focused Knowledge Questions, then lock one prompt + three specific TOK Objects\u00a0early to avoid forced links. Use two drafting cycles &#8230; <a title=\"IB TOK Exhibition Timeline 2026: 6-Month Plan from Topic to Submission\" class=\"read-more\" href=\"https:\/\/times.edu.vn\/en\/ib\/ib-tok-exhibition-timeline\/\" aria-label=\"Read more about IB TOK Exhibition Timeline 2026: 6-Month Plan from Topic to Submission\">Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":35853,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"content-type":"","rank_math_title":"","rank_math_description":"IB TOK Exhibition timeline: 6-month plan from picking IA prompt to final submission. Object selection, commentary drafting, mark scheme alignment for full 10 marks.","footnotes":""},"categories":[170],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-35852","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-ib"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/times.edu.vn\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35852","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/times.edu.vn\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/times.edu.vn\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/times.edu.vn\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/times.edu.vn\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=35852"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/times.edu.vn\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35852\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":39622,"href":"https:\/\/times.edu.vn\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35852\/revisions\/39622"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/times.edu.vn\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/35853"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/times.edu.vn\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=35852"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/times.edu.vn\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=35852"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/times.edu.vn\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=35852"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}