{"id":46377,"date":"2026-09-18T09:00:04","date_gmt":"2026-09-18T02:00:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/times.edu.vn\/chua-phan-loai\/ib-chemistry-ia-common-mistakes\/"},"modified":"2026-09-17T15:28:02","modified_gmt":"2026-09-17T08:28:02","slug":"ib-chemistry-ia-common-mistakes","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/times.edu.vn\/en\/ib\/ib-chemistry-ia-common-mistakes\/","title":{"rendered":"IB Chemistry IA common mistakes 2026: What loses marks and how to avoid them"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>IB Chemistry IA common mistakes often come from weak research design, vague research questions, poor uncertainty treatment, superficial evaluation, and unclear scientific communication rather than a lack of chemistry knowledge. Students can also lose marks by choosing topics that are difficult to measure accurately, failing to demonstrate genuine personal engagement, or presenting data without the precision required by the assessment criteria. Many of these problems are procedural and can be corrected before final submission through careful review of the rubric.<\/p>\n<p>This guide explains the most common mistakes in the IB Chemistry IA and how students can recognise and avoid them more effectively.<\/p>\n<h2>Choosing a topic that is too simple or difficult to measure accurately in IB Chemistry IA<\/h2>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/times.edu.vn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/IB-Chemistry-IA-common-mistakes.webp\" alt=\"IB Chemistry IA common mistakes\" width=\"1000\" height=\"667\"><\/p>\n<p>One of the earliest and most consequential <a href=\"https:\/\/times.edu.vn\/en\/ib\/ib-chemistry\/\">IB Chemistry<\/a> IA <sup><a href=\"#tooltip-ref-1\" class=\"tooltip-link\" data-tooltip=\"https:\/\/ibo.org\/programmes\/diploma-programme\/curriculum\/sciences\/chemistry\/\">[1]<\/a><\/sup> common pitfalls is the topic selection itself. Students frequently fall into two opposite traps: Choosing an investigation so straightforward that it offers no analytical depth, or selecting one so complex that it becomes impossible to collect clean, measurable data within a school laboratory setting.<\/p>\n<p>A topic such as &#8220;how temperature affects the rate of a chemical reaction&#8221; without a specific system, defined chemical species, and measurable outcome is the classic example of a vague starting point. The <a href=\"https:\/\/times.edu.vn\/en\/ib\/the-ultimate-ib-diploma-program-ibdp-guide\/\">IB<\/a> examiner is not evaluating whether chemistry happens; they are evaluating whether you can design and analyze a rigorous, quantifiable investigation. Topics that produce only qualitative observations (color changes without spectrophotometry, for instance) tend to limit the ceiling for marks in both the analysis and evaluation criteria.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>A common mistake we see at <a href=\"https:\/\/times.edu.vn\/\">Times Edu<\/a> is students selecting titration-based investigations without understanding the instrument limitations of a school burette. If your experimental design cannot generate data with consistent, meaningful uncertainty values, the entire data processing section weakens. The best topics sit in a measurable middle ground: Electrochemical cells, enzyme kinetics with controlled pH and temperature, colorimetry-based concentration studies, or enthalpy change investigations using a calibrated calorimeter. These generate numerical data, allow for uncertainty propagation, and connect to the IB Chemistry syllabus in ways that enable deep evaluation.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\t<button class='btn-dang-ky' onclick=\"openPopup('popup1')\">\n\t\t<span class='text-effect-1'>\n\t\t\t<svg\n\t\t\t\txmlns='http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg'\n\t\t\t\tviewBox='0 0 64 64'\n\t\t\t\twidth='24'\n\t\t\t\theight='24'\n\t\t\t\taria-label='Calendar icon'\n\t\t\t>\n\t\t\t\t<rect width='64' height='64' rx='6' fill='#caa15a'\/>\n\t\t\t\t<rect x='10' y='14' width='44' height='40' rx='4'\n\t\t\t\t\tfill='none' stroke='#ffffff' stroke-width='4'\/>\n\t\t\t\t<line x1='10' y1='24' x2='54' y2='24'\n\t\t\t\t\tstroke='#ffffff' stroke-width='4'\/>\n\t\t\t\t<line x1='22' y1='6' x2='22' y2='18'\n\t\t\t\t\tstroke='#ffffff' stroke-width='4' stroke-linecap='round'\/>\n\t\t\t\t<line x1='42' y1='6' x2='42' y2='18'\n\t\t\t\t\tstroke='#ffffff' stroke-width='4' stroke-linecap='round'\/>\n\t\t\t<\/svg>\n\t\t\tBook a Trial Class\n\t\t<\/span>\n\t<\/button>\n<p><strong style=\"color:#f00;\">>>> Read more:<\/strong> <a class=\"xem-them-link\" href=\"https:\/\/times.edu.vn\/en\/ib\/ib-chemistry-past-papers\/\">IB Chemistry past papers<\/a> 2026: The complete guide to finding and using them effectively<\/p>\n<h2>Failing to demonstrate genuine personal engagement in the IB Chemistry IA<\/h2>\n<p>Personal engagement is the criterion that trips up even high-achieving students, largely because it is misunderstood. Many students believe that writing a personal story in the introduction, such as &#8220;I was inspired by cooking pasta,&#8221; automatically earns full marks here. It does not.<\/p>\n<p>Weak personal engagement in IB Chemistry IA means that the investigation reads as though it could have been designed by any student, at any school, following a standard textbook protocol. Examiners look for evidence that you made deliberate, intellectually motivated choices throughout the investigation, not just in the opening paragraph. This includes choosing a non-standard concentration range because of a specific chemical reasoning, modifying a standard procedure to test a more refined hypothesis, or connecting the investigation explicitly to a real-world context that is genuinely meaningful to you.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>One critical detail often overlooked is that personal engagement must be visible in the methodology, not just in an introductory paragraph. If you chose to investigate the effect of pH on amylase activity because your family member has a digestive condition, that connection must surface again in how you interpret your results and why certain outcomes matter beyond the laboratory. At Times Edu, we coach students to thread their motivation through the entire document rather than confining it to a single opening statement.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong style=\"color:#f00;\">>>> Read more:<\/strong> <a class=\"xem-them-link\" href=\"https:\/\/times.edu.vn\/en\/ib\/ib-chemistry-high-yield-topics\/\">IB Chemistry high yield topics<\/a> 2026: Where to focus your revision for maximum marks<\/p>\n<h2>Poor experimental design and insufficient control of variables in IB Chemistry IA<\/h2>\n<p>Variable control mistakes in IB Chemistry are among the most heavily penalized issues in Criterion A, which covers the exploration and research design. A common structure failure is listing controlled variables without explaining either how they were controlled or why controlling them matters in the context of the specific chemical system being studied.<\/p>\n<p>Consider the difference between these two approaches:<\/p>\n<table>\n<tr>\n<th colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">Variable<\/th>\n<th colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">How it was controlled<\/th>\n<th colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">Why it matters chemically<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">Room temperature<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">Experiments conducted within a 30-minute window in an air-conditioned room<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">Ambient temperature affects the kinetic energy of reactant molecules and can alter rate independently of the manipulated variable<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">Concentration of HCl<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">Prepared as a single stock solution diluted to exact volumes using a grade-A volumetric flask<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">Inconsistent concentration would introduce a confounding variable that skews rate data<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">Surface area of solid reactant<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">Marble chips sieved to a 2.0 to 2.5 mm size range<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">Larger surface area increases reaction rate; controlling this isolates the effect of the independent variable<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<p>The left column of a variable table alone earns no marks. The table above illustrates the standard that examiners expect. Every variable must be accompanied by a specific, chemistry-grounded explanation.<\/p>\n<p>Research questions are another source of IB Chemistry IA errors at the design stage. A vague title such as &#8220;How does temperature affect a reaction?&#8221; Will be flagged immediately. The corrected version should read something like: &#8220;How does the concentration of sodium thiosulfate, varied from 0.10 mol dm to 0.50 mol dm in increments of 0.10 mol dm, affect the initial rate of reaction with 1.0 mol dm hydrochloric acid at 25.0 degrees Celsius?&#8221; Every key variable, its range, and the units must appear in the research question itself.<\/p>\n\n\t<button class='btn-dang-ky' onclick=\"openPopup('popup1')\">\n\t\t<span class='text-effect-1'>\n\t\t\t<svg\n\t\t\t\txmlns='http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg'\n\t\t\t\tviewBox='0 0 64 64'\n\t\t\t\twidth='24'\n\t\t\t\theight='24'\n\t\t\t\taria-label='Calendar icon'\n\t\t\t>\n\t\t\t\t<rect width='64' height='64' rx='6' fill='#caa15a'\/>\n\t\t\t\t<rect x='10' y='14' width='44' height='40' rx='4'\n\t\t\t\t\tfill='none' stroke='#ffffff' stroke-width='4'\/>\n\t\t\t\t<line x1='10' y1='24' x2='54' y2='24'\n\t\t\t\t\tstroke='#ffffff' stroke-width='4'\/>\n\t\t\t\t<line x1='22' y1='6' x2='22' y2='18'\n\t\t\t\t\tstroke='#ffffff' stroke-width='4' stroke-linecap='round'\/>\n\t\t\t\t<line x1='42' y1='6' x2='42' y2='18'\n\t\t\t\t\tstroke='#ffffff' stroke-width='4' stroke-linecap='round'\/>\n\t\t\t<\/svg>\n\t\t\tBook a Trial Class\n\t\t<\/span>\n\t<\/button>\n<p><strong style=\"color:#f00;\">>>> Read more:<\/strong> <a class=\"xem-them-link\" href=\"https:\/\/times.edu.vn\/en\/ib\/ib-chemistry-how-to-get-a-7\/\">IB Chemistry how to get a 7<\/a> : The complete strategy guide 2026<\/p>\n<h2>Weak data analysis and incorrect propagation of uncertainties in IB Chemistry IA<\/h2>\n<p>Uncertainty errors in IB Chemistry IA analysis are extremely common and represent a major source of low marks in Criterion B. The most frequent issue is mismatched decimal places between instrument precision and recorded data. If a student uses an analytical balance that reads to three decimal places (0.001 g), every mass value in the raw data table must be recorded to three decimal places. Recording 2.5 g when the instrument reads 2.500 g tells an examiner that the student does not understand measurement precision.<\/p>\n<p>A second and equally serious data presentation mistake in IB Chemistry involves the failure to propagate uncertainties through calculations. Raw uncertainty values from individual instruments must be carried through every mathematical step. The rules are straightforward:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>When <strong>adding or subtracting<\/strong> measurements, add the absolute uncertainties.<\/li>\n<li>When <strong>multiplying or dividing<\/strong> measurements, add the percentage uncertainties.<\/li>\n<li>The final calculated result (for example, an activation energy or an enthalpy change) must include a boundary of error derived from this propagation.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<blockquote><p>In our experience working with international students preparing for IB submission, the uncertainty section is often left as a rushed afterthought. This is a critical error because it directly affects the credibility of the conclusion. If a student cannot quantify the reliability of their final result, they cannot meaningfully discuss whether it aligns with a literature value.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Graph formatting is a further source of data presentation mistakes in Chemistry IA. The most common graph errors include:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Omitting error bars entirely, or drawing them without explaining how the bar size was calculated<\/li>\n<li>Failing to include axis titles with correct units<\/li>\n<li>Forcing a line of best fit through the origin (0, 0) when the data does not justify this<\/li>\n<li>Using a bar chart when a scatter plot with a trend line is the appropriate format for continuous data<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Software such as Excel, Google Sheets, or LoggerPro should be used to generate clean scatter diagrams. The R-squared value should be displayed where a linear relationship is claimed, and error bars must be sized consistently with the processed uncertainty values from the raw data table.<\/p>\n<p><strong style=\"color:#f00;\">>>> Read more:<\/strong> <a class=\"xem-them-link\" href=\"https:\/\/times.edu.vn\/en\/ib\/ib-chemistry-exam-technique\/\">IB Chemistry exam technique<\/a> 2026: The complete guide to scoring higher across all papers<\/p>\n<h2>Superficial evaluation that fails to address limitations meaningfully in IB Chemistry IA<\/h2>\n<p>Poor evaluation in IB Chemistry IA is one of the most reliably damaging mistakes a student can make, and it is also one of the most teachable areas to improve. Criterion D (Evaluation) rewards students who think like scientists: Identifying what went wrong, explaining why it went wrong at a methodological or apparatus level, and proposing specific, actionable improvements.<\/p>\n<p>The single most common error is blaming &#8220;human error.&#8221; Phrases such as &#8220;I might have made a calculation mistake&#8221; or &#8220;I could have misread the meniscus&#8221; signal to an examiner that the student does not understand the difference between a systematic limitation and a personal failure. The IB grading logic assumes that you are a competent scientist. If you made a calculation error, you should have caught and corrected it before submission.<\/p>\n<p>Evaluations that earn high marks focus on systematic and random errors embedded in the apparatus and procedure itself. Below is a comparison of weak versus strong evaluation language:<\/p>\n<table>\n<tr>\n<th colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">Weak evaluation<\/th>\n<th colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">Strong evaluation<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">&#8220;There may have been human error when measuring volumes.&#8221;<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">&#8220;The use of a standard glass burette introduces a parallax error of up to +\/- 0.05 cm per reading; over two readings, this accumulates to a maximum absolute uncertainty of +\/- 0.10 cm in each titre value.&#8221;<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">&#8220;I should use better equipment next time.&#8221;<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">&#8220;Replacing the polystyrene cup calorimeter with a Dewar flask would reduce heat loss to the surroundings, as the evacuated double-wall design minimizes convective and radiative heat transfer, improving enthalpy calculation accuracy.&#8221;<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">&#8220;More trials would improve reliability.&#8221;<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">&#8220;Conducting five trials per concentration level, rather than three, and applying Grubb&#8217;s test to identify statistical outliers would reduce the effect of random error on the calculated mean rate.&#8221;<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">&#8220;The experiment could be improved with a thermometer.&#8221;<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">&#8220;A digital temperature probe with +\/- 0.1 degree Celsius resolution, logging data at one-second intervals, would capture real-time temperature fluctuations during the reaction that a standard mercury thermometer cannot detect.&#8221;<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<blockquote><p>One critical detail often overlooked in evaluation sections is the requirement to connect each identified limitation back to its likely impact on the result. Did heat loss cause the enthalpy value to be lower than the literature value? Did the lack of stirring introduce inconsistency between trials? Stating the limitation is worth some credit; explaining its directional effect on the final result is what earns the top band.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\t<button class='btn-dang-ky' onclick=\"openPopup('popup1')\">\n\t\t<span class='text-effect-1'>\n\t\t\t<svg\n\t\t\t\txmlns='http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg'\n\t\t\t\tviewBox='0 0 64 64'\n\t\t\t\twidth='24'\n\t\t\t\theight='24'\n\t\t\t\taria-label='Calendar icon'\n\t\t\t>\n\t\t\t\t<rect width='64' height='64' rx='6' fill='#caa15a'\/>\n\t\t\t\t<rect x='10' y='14' width='44' height='40' rx='4'\n\t\t\t\t\tfill='none' stroke='#ffffff' stroke-width='4'\/>\n\t\t\t\t<line x1='10' y1='24' x2='54' y2='24'\n\t\t\t\t\tstroke='#ffffff' stroke-width='4'\/>\n\t\t\t\t<line x1='22' y1='6' x2='22' y2='18'\n\t\t\t\t\tstroke='#ffffff' stroke-width='4' stroke-linecap='round'\/>\n\t\t\t\t<line x1='42' y1='6' x2='42' y2='18'\n\t\t\t\t\tstroke='#ffffff' stroke-width='4' stroke-linecap='round'\/>\n\t\t\t<\/svg>\n\t\t\tBook a Trial Class\n\t\t<\/span>\n\t<\/button>\n<p><strong style=\"color:#f00;\">>>> Read more:<\/strong> <a class=\"xem-them-link\" href=\"https:\/\/times.edu.vn\/en\/ib\/ib-chemistry-common-mistakes\/\">IB Chemistry common mistakes<\/a> 2026: The errors that cost students the most marks<\/p>\n<h2>Communication and safety documentation mistakes in the IB Chemistry IA<\/h2>\n<p>Communication errors in IB Chemistry IA affect the overall presentation criterion, which many students underestimate. An investigation that contains excellent data and strong evaluation can still lose marks if the document is poorly organized, uses inconsistent notation, or presents information in a confusing sequence.<\/p>\n<p>A common mistake we see involves the formatting of chemical formulas and equations. Subscripts must be correctly applied (H2O, not H2O), and equations must be balanced with state symbols included where relevant. Inconsistent use of SI units across different sections of the report, such as switching between joules and kilojoules without explanation, signals a lack of scientific rigor.<\/p>\n<p>Safety and ethical considerations are another area where students frequently fall short. Many IB Chemistry IA reports omit a risk assessment entirely or include only one-line statements such as &#8220;goggles were worn.&#8221; Examiners expect a brief but substantive acknowledgment of the specific hazards involved, the relevant GHS hazard classifications for the chemicals used, and the steps taken to mitigate each risk. For investigations involving biological systems, ethical considerations regarding organism welfare may also be required.<\/p>\n<p>Plagiarism in IB Chemistry IA is a serious issue that extends beyond copying text. Submitting a methodology that is lifted directly from a published protocol without modification or acknowledgment, using graphs from online sources, or incorporating data collected by other students without disclosure all constitute academic dishonesty under IB regulations. The consequences range from a score of zero on the affected criterion to referral of the case to the IB for further action. At Times Edu, we consistently advise students that originality in design is not just an ethical obligation; it is also the foundation of genuine personal engagement, which directly affects their mark.<\/p>\n<p><strong style=\"color:#f00;\">>>> Read more:<\/strong> <a class=\"xem-them-link\" href=\"https:\/\/times.edu.vn\/en\/ib\/ib-chemistry-command-terms\/\">IB Chemistry command terms<\/a> 2026: What they mean and how to respond correctly<\/p>\n<h2>Frequently asked questions<\/h2>\n<p><strong>What are the most common reasons IB Chemistry IAs receive low marks?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The most frequent causes of a low mark in IB Chemistry IA include vague research questions, failure to propagate uncertainties correctly, surface-level conclusions that do not compare results to literature values, and evaluations that blame human error rather than systemic apparatus limitations. These issues span all four grading criteria and are consistently flagged in IB examiner reports.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Why do many students score poorly on personal engagement in the IB Chemistry IA?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Weak personal engagement in IB Chemistry IA typically results from students treating the criterion as a single introductory paragraph rather than a thread that runs through the entire investigation. Personal engagement must be visible in design choices, analytical interpretations, and the discussion of real-world relevance, not just in a motivational opening statement.<\/p>\n<p><strong>What does weak evaluation look like in an IB Chemistry IA?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Poor evaluation in IB Chemistry IA is characterized by vague language (human error, better equipment, more trials), an absence of connection between limitations and their effect on the final result, and improvements that lack specificity. A strong evaluation names the exact apparatus flaw, quantifies its effect where possible, and proposes a named, engineering-level solution.<\/p>\n<p><strong>How should uncertainties be handled in an IB Chemistry IA analysis?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Every measurement must be recorded to the precision level of the instrument used. Uncertainties must be propagated through all calculations using the rules for absolute and percentage uncertainty. The final result must carry a boundary of error calculated from this propagation, and graphs must include error bars derived from the processed data rather than estimated visually.<\/p>\n<p><strong>How do variable control mistakes affect the IB Chemistry IA exploration criterion?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Variable control mistakes in IB Chemistry reduce marks in Criterion A by demonstrating that the experimental design is not sufficiently rigorous. Listing controlled variables without explaining the method of control and the chemical rationale behind that control leaves significant marks on the table. Examiners look for a systematic, justified approach to isolating the independent variable.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Can plagiarism in an IB Chemistry IA result in a zero for the whole criterion?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Yes. Plagiarism in IB Chemistry IA can result in a zero for the affected criterion and may be escalated to a formal academic misconduct investigation by the IB. This includes unattributed use of published protocols, copying data, reproducing graphs from external sources, and submitting work that is not demonstrably the student&#8217;s own.<\/p>\n<p><strong>What are the most common data presentation mistakes in an IB Chemistry IA?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Data presentation mistakes in Chemistry IA include mismatched decimal places between raw data and instrument precision, missing uncertainty columns in data tables, graphs without error bars or axis units, incorrect choice of graph type, and failure to display the equation of the line of best fit when a linear relationship is being analyzed.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Conclusion <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>At Times Edu, our specialist IB Chemistry tutors work with students from the earliest brainstorming stage through final submission, providing criterion-by-criterion feedback that mirrors the language and expectations of IB examiners. If you or your child is currently preparing an IB Chemistry IA and wants expert guidance on avoiding these pitfalls, we invite you to book a personalized academic consultation with our team. The difference between a 5 and a 7 on the IA is often not more chemistry knowledge; it is a clearer understanding of what the examiner is actually looking for.<\/p>\n\n\n<div class=\"kk-star-ratings kksr-auto kksr-align-right kksr-valign-bottom\"\n    data-payload='{&quot;align&quot;:&quot;right&quot;,&quot;id&quot;:&quot;46377&quot;,&quot;slug&quot;:&quot;default&quot;,&quot;valign&quot;:&quot;bottom&quot;,&quot;ignore&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;reference&quot;:&quot;auto&quot;,&quot;class&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;count&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;legendonly&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;readonly&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;score&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;starsonly&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;best&quot;:&quot;5&quot;,&quot;gap&quot;:&quot;5&quot;,&quot;greet&quot;:&quot;\u0110\u00e1nh gi\u00e1 b\u00e0i vi\u1ebft&quot;,&quot;legend&quot;:&quot;0\\\/5 - (0 votes)&quot;,&quot;size&quot;:&quot;24&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;IB Chemistry IA common mistakes 2026: What loses marks and how to avoid them&quot;,&quot;width&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;_legend&quot;:&quot;{score}\\\/{best} - ({count} {votes})&quot;,&quot;font_factor&quot;:&quot;1.25&quot;}'>\n            \n<div class=\"kksr-stars\">\n    \n<div class=\"kksr-stars-inactive\">\n            <div class=\"kksr-star\" data-star=\"1\" style=\"padding-right: 5px\">\n            \n\n<div class=\"kksr-icon\" style=\"width: 24px; height: 24px;\"><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n            <div class=\"kksr-star\" data-star=\"2\" style=\"padding-right: 5px\">\n            \n\n<div class=\"kksr-icon\" style=\"width: 24px; height: 24px;\"><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n            <div class=\"kksr-star\" data-star=\"3\" style=\"padding-right: 5px\">\n            \n\n<div class=\"kksr-icon\" style=\"width: 24px; height: 24px;\"><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n            <div class=\"kksr-star\" data-star=\"4\" style=\"padding-right: 5px\">\n            \n\n<div class=\"kksr-icon\" style=\"width: 24px; height: 24px;\"><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n            <div class=\"kksr-star\" data-star=\"5\" style=\"padding-right: 5px\">\n            \n\n<div class=\"kksr-icon\" style=\"width: 24px; height: 24px;\"><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/div>\n    \n<div class=\"kksr-stars-active\" style=\"width: 0px;\">\n            <div class=\"kksr-star\" style=\"padding-right: 5px\">\n            \n\n<div class=\"kksr-icon\" style=\"width: 24px; height: 24px;\"><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n            <div class=\"kksr-star\" style=\"padding-right: 5px\">\n            \n\n<div class=\"kksr-icon\" style=\"width: 24px; height: 24px;\"><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n            <div class=\"kksr-star\" style=\"padding-right: 5px\">\n            \n\n<div class=\"kksr-icon\" style=\"width: 24px; height: 24px;\"><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n            <div class=\"kksr-star\" style=\"padding-right: 5px\">\n            \n\n<div class=\"kksr-icon\" style=\"width: 24px; height: 24px;\"><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n            <div class=\"kksr-star\" style=\"padding-right: 5px\">\n            \n\n<div class=\"kksr-icon\" style=\"width: 24px; height: 24px;\"><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/div>\n<\/div>\n                \n\n<div class=\"kksr-legend\" style=\"font-size: 19.2px;\">\n            <span class=\"kksr-muted\">\u0110\u00e1nh gi\u00e1 b\u00e0i vi\u1ebft<\/span>\n    <\/div>\n    <\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>IB Chemistry IA common mistakes often come from weak research design, vague research questions, poor uncertainty treatment, superficial evaluation, and unclear scientific communication rather than a lack of chemistry knowledge. Students can also lose marks by choosing topics that are difficult to measure accurately, failing to demonstrate genuine personal engagement, or presenting data without the &#8230; <a title=\"IB Chemistry IA common mistakes 2026: What loses marks and how to avoid them\" class=\"read-more\" href=\"https:\/\/times.edu.vn\/en\/ib\/ib-chemistry-ia-common-mistakes\/\" aria-label=\"Read more about IB Chemistry IA common mistakes 2026: What loses marks and how to avoid them\">Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":10,"featured_media":46347,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"content-type":"","rank_math_title":"","rank_math_description":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[170],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-46377","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-ib"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/times.edu.vn\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/46377","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/times.edu.vn\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/times.edu.vn\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/times.edu.vn\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/10"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/times.edu.vn\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=46377"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/times.edu.vn\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/46377\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":46388,"href":"https:\/\/times.edu.vn\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/46377\/revisions\/46388"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/times.edu.vn\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/46347"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/times.edu.vn\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=46377"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/times.edu.vn\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=46377"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/times.edu.vn\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=46377"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}